STAGE # 1: The Peiod of
Mission Influence (1927 – 1938)
As mentioned above,
the SIM missionaries were the prominent architects for the new
evangelical Christian teachings in southern Ethiopia. As Fargher (1996,
1997) points out in his books the first expatriate missionaries provide
the converts with a host of new concepts: instant conversion, ethical
idealism, family restructuring, nonprofessional leadership in the
church, and a new authority structure, i.e. the Bible rather than
tradition. For this reason, it seems that the first SIM missionaries
taught the first converts that, “everything which was not of the new
Christian faith, as they understood it, was of Satan. The missionaries
preached Christ as the one who could deliver people from this bondage
which was usually fear,” (Fargher, 1996, P. 128). During conversion to
the “new Christian religion,” believers took the New Testament truth as
guide and authority. As Davis (1961) puts it, “they displayed a great
capacity for simple, childlike faith, and they have continuously showed
an unusual readiness to obey whatever they found in the word of God,”
(P. 244). Following conversion, the new believers immediately alienated
themselves from societal norms and some communal life activities. One
of the first things potential members of the new churches’ movement were
taught in pre-baptismal classes was the absolute necessity of living
“separated” lives.”
Dr. Lambie (1942)
himself writes clearly that the first SIM missionaries were not ready to
“compromise” with Spirit-revealed truth, whether it was “another
religion,” in fact other than “the new Christian religion,” cultural or
traditional issues: “for those won from the tree worship, the devil
worship, the spirit worship, and the nature worship, the animistic
religions of Abyssinia, the issue is equally clear. We must show the
truth, as it is in Christ Jesus. We must speak the truth in love. There
must be no compromise with Spirit revealed truth.” (P.169). Raymond
Davis (1966) seems in agreement with Lambie when he writes about this
very issue of “compromise.” For Davis, “this radical break with the old
way of life, coming at the beginning of the church, effectively set the
pattern to follow. It did not come at the white man’s instigation, but
arose naturally from the confrontation of Christianity and culture” (p.
77). For Albert Brant (1992) what the missionaries did at this very
stage was some how blameless. He reasoned out his view point this way:
“why does the missionary bother with such matters? Because in their
new-founded faith our people, [the KHC believers], looked to us, [the
SIM missionaries], for guidance. The devil had led them far from God.
They were like children who needed direction, and they recognized it.
Our only desire was that in all things they might please the Lord (p.
196). Thus, for Vincent Donovan (Taber, 1978) in this very initial
period, the missionaries should have stayed in existence only as a
counseling, guiding factor, not as an authoritative, controlling,
supplying source, (p. 105). For Fargher (1997) and Howard Brant (1984),
in addition to the primary change of religious viewpoint, “the New
Church’s’ Movement” also brought some other major effects in the life
of the new converts: cultural, socio-political and economical. As Brant
(1984) puts it clearly not only politically was the new church forced
to be reckoned with, but there were economic factors as well.
SIM missionaries
brought schools and new ideas of development. Believers’ children went
to school, and many of those who were not believers when they started
schools, converted en route. The result was that, besides their
conversion to evangelical Christianity, in some areas, the believers
were the most educated and economically advanced citizens of their
areas. In fact it was undeniable that lack of communication and shortage
of Scripture in the vernacular languages were some of the huge
challenges for the pioneer expatriates. For this reason many of the SIM
missionaries went through periods of discouragement; they had come to
Ethiopia to preach but could not do so until they had learned the
vernacular. In regard to the converts age group, although preaching was
always directed to individuals, the first fruits of the Gospel in
southern Ethiopia were predominantly healthy adult males; women were
converted and baptized but not in the same numbers as men. The reason
seems that no special attention was given to contact women and children
,(Fargher, 1996, pp. 132-136).
In sum, the SIM
pioneers in this specific stage were known more of by their ethical
preaching: “their immediate impacts of the preaching was ethical rather
than social, but the former quickly affected the latter (Fargher, 1996,
p. 132). Thus, alienation from the society, lack of fundamental biblical
knowledge and counseling were some of the major results of this stage.
As Davis (1966)
writes, focusing on this particular stage, “families were divided,
husbands from wives, children form parents. Participation in the new
movement required the costly step of coming out of the old life into the
new” (p. 243).
STAGE # 2 – THE PERIOD OF
THE SUFFERING INFANT CHURCH(1936-1941)
On October 3, 1935,
forty years later after its defeat in Adwa, in 18963,
Mussolini’s Fascist Italy under General de Bono crossed the Mereb River
and invaded Ethiopia. The Italians entered Ethiopia with the pretext of
civilizing the people. According to Guy Playfair (1943), “it is true the
Italians had greater worldly knowledge, but also greater darkness. If
brutality characterizes the brute, whether the domesticated bulldog or
the lion, leopard or hyena of the jungle, then the Italians were little
less than brutes and deserve all that they have suffered”(P.26).
With the flight of
Haile Selassie, Emperor of Ethiopia, for exile in England, Addis Ababa
fell to the enemy in May 1936. By mid-1937 all of the protestant
missionaries were forced to withdraw from Ethiopia. After only nine
short years of work in the land and after having received 18,870 pound
sterling as compensation for their expropriated, schools, hospitals some
other institutions, from the Italian invaders, the last of the
seventy-five SIM missionaries were expelled from the country in August
1938, (Davis, 1984; Cotterell, 1973; Fargher, 1996, 1997; SIM
publication, nd; Spencer, 1984). At the time of the mission expulsion,
in Walitta there were only two fellowships at infant stage possibly with
48 professed Christians. The SIM missionaries had baptized only 2
converts from the Kambata/Hadiya region and another 3 unidentified
believers at the SIM head quarter, Addis Ababa.
For those two infant
churches and for those handfuls of newly converted “seeds,” the
tyrant fascist invasion, the expulsion of the SIM missionaries as well
as the situations in the new Churches movement areas created very
pressing external and internal challenges. The first major external
challenge was related to the invasion itself that the southern part of
the country was affected seriously by the war. The Fascist armies made
Walaitta, one of their central bases for the southern regions (Balisky,
1997, P. 180). Then, according to Cotterell (1973), by mid-1939, after
three years of occupation, the Italian authorities parade and displayed
their military might in Soddo town, the capital of Walaitta. When the
parade was over, the foreign invaders made a proclamation: “The one who
gatheres and preaches [the Gospel]to the people in the [domains] kingdom
of Italy, beware,” (Balisky, P. 180, as quoted from Eshetu).
The second challenge
was focused on language use. As mentioned earlier, before the SIM
missionaries evacuated from Walaitta, they had succeeded in translating,
printing and distributing the Gospel of Mark and a few other selected
portions of scripture in a small number of copies in Walitta language.
For the most part, the Walaittas had to use the Bible in Amharic, a very
different Semitic language for the Omotic language speaking Walaittas.
But after the missionary withdrawal from the country, “the Italian
invaders replaced the Ethiopic script [Amharic] with the Roman script” (Cotterell,
1973, P. 101). Due to these reasons, the believers were forced to
become, “Christians but without having the Bible.”
The third challenge
arose from the Roman Catholic Church. Since the Roman Catholic Church
had served as advance agents for the Fascist invaders, the church
labeled all the evangelical believers as a threat for the advancement of
the invasion. The Roman Catholic Church became one of the persecutor
for those new and infant churches (Cotterell, 1973; Balisky, 1997;
Wondiye, 1998)
Davis (1966) writes
that the Italian military and political authorities bitterly fought to
suppress the new church movement, which they looked upon as a potential
threat because of its size and external allegiance. The Roman Catholic
Church, backed by the Italian occupational government, tried hard to
draw the evangelized church into the orbit of its influence. When this
failed persecution increased. Guy Playfair (1943) writes about the
extent of the persecution as follow:
When
the Italian realized that the Church was making progress in spite of
persecution they arrested fifty church leaders, who were taken to prison
under police escort, where each of them was given up to one hundred
lashes and one poor man, who lives to tell the story, received four
hundred. None of these men could lie on their backs for months. They
were left bleeding and torn with their flesh like raw meat. Three of
them died while the others languished in prison. The authorities gave
them no food. This had to be supplied by friends who came some from far
away, carrying daily bread to their imprisoned companions (p. 26).
Although the
persecution seemed fierce the converts were extremely bold enough to
preach the Good News to their people. Lambie (1942) testifies such an
amazing experience this way, “one of the Walaitta evangelists [Wandaro]
received two hundred lashes from the Italians for preaching the Gospel,
but he continued to preach”(p. 171).
The fourth challenge
was internal which occurred by the SIM itself. Although there was ample
time to recruit the future indigenous leaders before the Italian
invasion took place, the SIM missionaries only transferred the
leadership responsibility at the last minute, after the war had already
started. In April 1937, at the eve of their final departure, the
missionaries appointed Ato Biru Dubale as the leader of the Walaitta
believers, (Balisky, 1997, P. 175). In addition to such a big leadership
responsibility, the missionaries assigned Ato Biru the responsibility of
guarding the SIM Otona [Walaitta] compound.
On August 29, 1937,
Ato Shigute and Ato4
Sebro, who escorted the pioneer SIM missionaries, as they were leaving
Lambuda, in Hossana, to Addis, were ordained by the missionaries as
elders of the Kambata church at the last minutes (Cotterell, 1973 ;
Grenstedt, 1995). Many indigenous writers, (Wondiye, 1998; Getachew,
2000; Berehanu, 1983), refer to this last minute leadership transfer
process as an evidence of lack of trust and confidence of the indigenous
leadership style and personal qualities of the people. Lambie (1942)
agrees with the indigenous writers when he writes on this point that,
”one of the last acts performed by our missionaries before they were
forced to leave was to instruct some of the more advanced believers in
the principles of church organization and in the ordaining of elders”
(p. 170). Although little had been done by the SIM expatriates, after
they left the country, an indigenous pattern of worship with antiphonal
singing, services led by active coordinaters, baptisms coinciding with
early communion services and monthly meetings extending through the
night at different places” (Grenstedt).
The persecution and
the hardship had overwhelmed the newly growing infant Churches and the
believers were fueled by little more than the basic truths of the
Gospel, their changed lives and joyful witness were echoing from
horizons to horizons. The movement blew like a fresh wind to most parts.
Opposition was widespread and often fierce. As mentioned earlier, there
were many imprisonments and beatings. The prominent leaders like Wandaro
‘rewarded’ forty stripes with the cruel hippo-hide whip-a wide stripe of
inch-thick hippo hide cut into strands with sharp metal pieces at the
end of each strand (Davis, 1966, p. 125). This came not from traditional
religionists, but from those with vested interests in the Roman Chatolic
church, sympathizers with the invaders and the Italian “conquerors.” At
times, church gatherings were held under cover of darkness or in remote
locations (Davis, 1984 and 1966).
Although the
challenges of the new believers were full of different difficulties in
this stage, as Davis (1984) quoted from Jeldu’s testimony, “as thirsty
cattle turn to the water, so the people began to turn to God. People
everywhere began to leave their Satan worship and pagan practices. As a
bomb bursts and spreads its fire, so the Word of God burst and began to
spread throughout the [region.],” (p. 9).
Laurie Davison, the
first returnee with the British army, reported to the SIM International
office such an incredible story:
It is our earnest hope
that no member of our mission will do or say anything to destroy the
autonomous structure of this amazing Walaitta church. The membership
today stands at somewhere around fifteen thousand baptized believers,
and its remarkable history comes a grand second to that record in the
book of the Acts of the Apostles (Cotterell, 1973, p. 103).
Malcolm Forsberg, one of the pioneer SIM
missionaries in Ethiopia (1966) confirms the report as follows:
Following the Italian
occupation the church had grown, spreading in every direction from the
original centers in Walaitta and kembata. During the occupation the
church had worked out its own form of government and discipline. The
people recognized its elders and officers. Discipline was administered
without partiality. The number of members was approaching the 160,000
mark. The churches in the various tribes had joined hands in an
organization, which they called The Fellowship of Ethiopian Evangelical
Churches5.
(p.195).
Lambie (1942) emphasizes such a magnificent
reality when he writes:
When we left Abyssinia
[Ethiopia] there were two churches in this area. They seemed weak and
helpless, but in the five years under Italian oppression, instead of
being snuffed out, as one might suppose would have happened, they have
had this phenomenal growth. [The news] caused our hearts to go up in
songs of praise to God for what He has wrought (P. 171).
As many writers
recorded, when missionaries left the country due to the invasion of the
Fascist Italy, to count more than a hundred believers was difficult. But
after the missionaries had returned back to Wallaita alone it was
difficult to find a man who was not a Christian. “The Gospel light had
not been snuffed out but was blazing more strongly than ever” (Davis,
1966, p. 103). This was true not only in the geographical triangle of
Walaitta, Kambata/Hadiya and Sidamo, but also in the other areas of the
southern parts of the country. The Good News had spread like wildfire.
Because of the Gospel message many tribes stopped their former animosity
and became one in Christ:
The Walaitta in former
years hated the Kembatas. They had frequent pitched battles. Now the
biggest of the seventy churches is on the border between the two
countries, a place that was formerly very dangerous territory. Those who
practiced the most heathenish rites are now children of the King. Those
who raided each other on the slightest excuse, or no excuse, now build
churches and entertain the evangelists from the other tribe (Lambie,
1942 p. 170).
In Walaitta the
churches established their own structures. From Davison’s report the
following extracts were taken:
The territory was
divided into fifteen sections, with one Ruling Elder in each section.
Then each section was divided into individual church areas, with four or
more elders in each church. The elders of the church concerned settle
minor matters of dispute that arose within a church. Matters a little
more difficult were referred to the Ruling Elder of the district, who
may call the elders of several of his churches together and settled the
matter. Matters of great importance were taken by the Ruling Elder to
the Monthly Meeting, were the Council of Ruling Elders regularly
considers such matters, (Cotterell, 1973, p. 105).
Playfair’s (1943) words provide a good
summary for this section:
The movement is
all-glorious and we are glad that no white man was there during these
awful years of Italian rule. Had a white missionary been there the new
converts might have looked to him instead of the Lord for help and men
would have praised him and robbed God of His glory. It has been given
the Lord can carry on His own work (p. 32).
Clarence Duff (1980)
agrees with playfair’s observation in that, “looking back now it is very
evident that God in his perfect wisdom did take out his foreign
messengers for a good purpose, and returned them in his own good time to
work with and alongside a church that had learned by experience to
depend on God and not on man for its life (p. 384).
As Lambie (1942)
writes, “the Holy Spirit is the perfect guide and is adequate for all
emergencies. War and oppression furnished good soil for the Word of God,
in Ethiopia” (p. 172)
STAGE # 3 – THE PERIOD OF
THE YOUNG GROWING CHURCH (1942 –1973)
In June 1940, Italy’s
entry into World War II on the side of Germany made Britain and Ethiopia
allies against a common enemy. Emperor Haile Selassie, who had spent
most of his exile in England, believed that the turning-point had come
in his country’s affairs, and flew from London to confer with the
British Army chiefs in Sudan, Khartoum (Willmott, 1960). “The Fascists
had scarcely established themselves, when in 1941 triumphant Ethiopian
patriots, aided by the British, stormed their way back to the capital
city of Addis Ababa by way of the Sudan” (Brant, 1993, p. 3). On May 5,
1941, exactly five years after the Italian entry in Addis Ababa, Emperor
Haile Selassie returned to his capital. As soon as the reigns of control
were back in his hands the Emperor had shown his desire for reform in
the Orthodox Church by introducing the Amharic language into religious
life. Not only were all the EOC liturgical services then conducted in
Ge’ez, but also all theological books of every kind were in Ge’ez, which
is incomprehensible to the laity as well as to a majority of the clergy
(O’hanlon, 1946, p. 68). The Emperor was also insistent that the study
of John’s Gospel and the Book of Psalms be made part of the daily
curriculum in the government schools (Cumbers, 1995, p. 17).
For Brant (1992),
“missionaries had been prepared to bear the Good News to a waiting
people. And Haile Sellasie had been prepared by God to facilitate the
propagation of the Gospel in his land,” (p. 105). According to Cumbers
(1995), “although the Emperor might have been trying to establish
Christian principles, he was thwarted by generations of prejudice on the
part of the Orthodox Church” (p. 17)Back to top
From his own frame of
reference, the Emperor started the awesome work to maintain Ethiopia’s
independence and to modernize the country (Grenstedt, 1995, P. 76). For
his overall strategy of building the nation, the Emperor showed
willingness to invite the foreign mission agents to become part of his
nation building. Haile Selassie’s concern was to gain technical, medical
and educational support from abroad and to benefit from the missions in
his modernization process (Grenstedt, 1995, p. 77).
In February 1942, the
Ministry of the Interior gave a general permission to societies, which
had previously worked in Ethiopia to return, subject to four simple
conditions to which nobody could object, (O’hanlon, 1946).
Brant (1992) writes:
Haile Sellasie was
different. He was solicitous of the help of foreigners, especially of
missionaries. As soon as he returned to Ethiopia after exile in Europe,
he called for the return of missionaries. He was the first sovereign to
give them a free hand to work in the interior. He encouraged
missionaries by granting permission for many stations from which to
teach and to minister to the needs of his people (p. 107).
But in relation to SIM,
for about five years, ever since the last SIM missionaries left the
country in 1938, almost no news about the believers or the places where
the mission work had commenced in Ethiopia had been available, (Duff,
1980). After the Ethiopian patriots and the British Allied Forces
liberated Addis Ababa from Italian occupation in May 1941, three men,
Glen Cain, Lieutenant Laurie Davison, and Allan Smith, who served in
World War II with the British forces returned to Ethiopia as employees
in the British army. From them the good news came out to the SIM people.Back to top
According to Wallmott
(1960) and Davis (1984) Lieutenant Laurie Davison, the former SIM
missionary to Walaitta, in Addis Ababa sought out some young believers
from Walaitta and Kambata, and listened to the wealth of experiences
they had to relate. As Davison listened to the talk that flowed between
the men, he noticed one recurring theme – that of multitudes in Kambata
and Walaitta areas having turned to the Lord. For Davison the numbers
mentioned by the people who reported such good news sounded incredible.
As a result, he sent to Khartoum, Sudan, a great message, which was
relayed at once by Dr. Thomas Lmbie to the General Director, Dr.
Bingham, then visiting the Nigeria: “Glorious news from Ethiopia reports
existence seventy functioning churches in Walaitta and Kambata areas.
Result work of native evangelists. Hallelujah!” ((Wallmott, 1960, pp.
54-55).
Dr. Thomas Lambie
(1942) reported such magnificent news this way:
For nearly five years
we have been in complete ignorance of what was going on in Southern
Abysinia. But on January 6, 1942, there reached us news of the most
amazing character. It is glorious news! News that a whole lifetime of
mission work has not equaled. News that changes much that I have
written. News of a movement in Abyssinia that is so far beyond our
fondest hopes and prayers that we can only stand in awe and reverence.
Our little faith is rebuked by the working of the mighty Spirit of God
(p. 170).
According to the
assembled facts by Laurie Davison, the number of believers in Walaitta
alone had increased to fifteen thousand, and the churches to more than
fifty. Men and women, entire families, with the fire of God burning in
their hearts, had spread out over most of their homeland to share the
wonderful works of God, (Cotterell 1973; Davis, 1984).
Based on Davison’s
detailed report, after seven solid years passed, in May 23, 1943 the
Rev. G. W. Playfair, successor to Dr. R. V. Bingaham, as General
Director of the SIM, with Alf Roke and Norm Couser, former SIM
missionaries to Ethiopia, arrived in Addis Ababa. From a report written
by Playfair, come the following extracts:Back to top
Upon entering the city
it was necessary to see the British Consul and Ethiopian officials to
present our passports and pay our respects. In order to be granted
permission to visit our former stations it was necessary to obtain an
interview with His Majesty, Emperor Haile Selassie. . . During our
interview, His Majesty told us that the Mission policy for the new era
was under consideration and until this policy was announced he could not
allow any of us to our former stations. [But with some exceptions, the
Emperor granted us] to visit Soddo and Yergalem, which are in the
Walaitta and Sidamo tribes (Playfair, 1943, p.17).
The reason why the
Emperor refused to grant permission for the SIM band was not
specifically stated in Playfair’s report. But according to John Hathaway
Spencer6,
one of the principal advisors of Emperor Haile Sellassie from 1936-1974,
the reason of refusal for granting permission for SIM had a historical
reason:
The Sudan Interior
Mission was no longer permitted to operate its hospital; this diminished
role was due, in part, to the activities of Dr. Lambie following the
Italian occupation. The SIM society encountered the most antipathy and
difficulties, because of its . . . proselytizing in violation of the new
legislation (Spencer, 1984, p. 170).
According to different writers (e.g.,
Cotterell, 1973; Wondiye, 1998) Of all the reasons given by Spencer, the
one about Dr. Lambie was a strong reason for the Emperor to refuse
giving permission to the SIM society. Dr. Peter Cotterell the SIM writer
puts it this way:
Dr. Lambie went to
surrender to the Italian authority. His telegram to ‘The Times of
London’ concerning the use by the Italians of mustard gas had been
published in the issue of March 25, and the Italians knew his open
condemnation of the aggression. His action now, in surrendering
personally, was criticized as unnecessary by some of the missionaries.
Lambie, of course, based his action on Romans 13:1, ‘be subject to the
higher powers.’ Rome was governing and he must be subject. Not everyone
shared his phlegmatic approach7
(1973, p. 87). After the Emperor had issued a No.3 decree on August 27,
1944,8
which regulated and controlled the missionaries’ activity, for some
reasons, the ban was lifted and the SIM once again was granted
permission to resume its work in Ethiopia in 1946.
The Imperial Decree on
Missions divided the country into “open areas,” that is, non-Orthodox
Christian areas where mission work was allowed in full, and “Ethiopian
Church Areas” (“closed areas”), that is, areas where the Ethiopian
Orthodox Church (EOC) was predominant and should be preserved. In the
“open areas” the mission societies were allowed freedom to preach the
faith of their respective denominations. But the language to be used for
education was understood to be Amharic in all areas of the country, (Grenstedt,
1995; Spencer, 1984).Back to top
Although the Decree in
general had little effect on SIM ministries in Southern parts of the
country, the rules of language hindered them a lot from communicating
the Gospel in local languages and prevented translations of the Bible
into the vernaculars. According to Grenstedt (1995), “the consequence
was that the SIM missionaries who arrived post Italian invasion in
general were less contextualised than missionaries arriving before the
Italian occupation. The new missionaries didn’t learn to communicate in
local languages like their colleagues before the Imperial Decree but
used languages, which needed translation (p. 85).
At this very stage,
according to Grenstedt (1995), there were different opinions between the
SIM central leadership and SIM missionaries in Ethiopia on how
self-government in the indigenous churches should be interpreted. For
instance, Mr. Beacham and Mr. Playfair, who were serving the mission
society in important positions at the International SIM Office, strongly
stressed “separation” from the so-called “worldly practices” like
drinking, smoking, and dancing. By “drinking” they did not even
differentiate between traditional “beer-drinking” [Tella?] and
local common drinks like the weak “borde.” But for those who were
serving in the fields, banning the believers from drinking local
borde was totally irrelevant to the context (Grenstedt, 1995, p.
83-85)
Finally, at a Field
Committee meeting in May 31 – June 4, 1947 SIM, as an institution,
sharpened its attitude and promulgated the following rules, aimed at
changing the cultural traditions:
1.Henceforth no
Christian servants are to be employed except those who have taken a
stand against drinking; dancing; tobacco; adult male circumcision and
such things of the old life.
2.Missionaries must not
attend a Communion Service of a church, which has not taken a stand
against these same things.
3.When the Kambatta
Bible and Teacher Training School is being conducted, one of the rules
for admission will be definite separation from the worldly practices, (Grenstedt,
1995, p. 83)
Such issues, i.e.,
local beer drinking, male circumcision, the eating of raw meat, the case
of baptizing polygamists etc. were not dealt by the missionaries
properly.
The missionaries also
limited the educational level of the believers to elementary classes,
[some argue that it was fourth grade]. As Fargher writes, “the main
purpose of this education was to [enable the believers] to [read and]
teach their Bible,” (1995, p. 124). Those who disobeyed the educational
level restrictions, even if for their own children, were excommunicated
from the church and pushed away from the community life (Getachew,
2000).
Slowly, the
relationship between the missionaries and the believers faced some
problems. The missionaries criticized many believers and some dynamic
leaders and evangelists, who were courageous enough to challenge the
missionaries with their leadership style and some other issues. Slow by
slow some senior converts were forced to change their membership to
another denomination. Among those key leaders, who decided to leave the
church due to such controversies, was Ato Biru Dubale, the first leader
for the Wallaita congregations. Many congregations became spilited from
the “mahber” (fellowship), (Getachew, 2000; Cotterell, 1973; Grenstedt,
1995; Wondiye, 1998 and 2000).
STAGE # 4 – THE PERIOD OF
AGONIES AND HALLELUJAH (Post 1974 and the aftermath)
During this period, a
big turning point took place in the Kale Heywet church’s history. In
February 1974 all of the SIM related churches unanimously voiced for
independence and autonomous self administration. After almost about
forty years of holding the name “SIM related churches”, they agreed to
change their names to “the Kale Heywet Churches”, literal translation
as “the Word of Life Churches”. The national coordinating office opened
in February 1974. The first general secretary of the Church , Ato Tekle
Wold Giorgis, was appointed, and the church started its ministries in a
new way. During the same year the country failed under the communist
administration. Suffering and persecution broke out all over the nation.
Almost all of the Kale Heywet congregations were stamped out. The
government confiscated most of the churches’ property. In 1976 the
government appropriated 33 upper level academic schools, which had been
run by the SIM mission. At the same time more than 200 elementry level
academic schools, run by the Kale Heywet church, were also taken over.
Some 1740 church buildings were sealed shut, some 97 Bible schools were
closed (Getachew, 2000; Cumbers, 1984). Christians were killed,
tortured, and thrown in jails and prisons. Finally, for the second time
the SIM missionaries left the county after handing over almost all the
remaining property and the mission stations, except the head quarter,
to the government.
Although the
situations were very pressing and awful, the Kale Heywet Church did not
stop its mission in doing the great commission assignment, which she
received from the Lord. In fact one can refer to at the communist era as
the era of “a great tribulation” for the whole evangelical churches at
large and for the Kale Heywet Church in particular. Yet, it was a period
in which the Kale Heywet church and the believers had demonstrated a
great deal of endurance and faithfulness. Due to this reasons the church
has grown in every aspect of its holistic ministries. After the fall of
the Derg regime, 1991, things have changed. Relatively speaking freedom
of worship for all religious groups has been respected. Today, as the
Kale Heywet Church Deputy General Secretary of the Spiritual Ministries
confirms, the Ethiopian Kale Heywet church comprises 5412 congregations
with about 4.5 members.
To sum up this
section, this fourth stage is refer to in the church’s history as a
period of great harvest. But the question which remains unanswered would
be the future relationships between the Kale Heywet Church and SIM. For
sure this question needs a serious attention from both parties.
Back to top
REFERENCE
Balisky, E. Paul
(1997). Walaitta Evangelists: A Study of Religious Innovation in
Southern Ethiopia, 1973-1975. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
University of Aberdeen, Scotland.
Berhanu Deresse
(1983). The History of Kale Heywet Church: Out Reach, Planting and
Growth. Unpublished master’s thesis, Nairobi International School of
Theology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Brant, Albert E.
(1992). In the Wake of Martyrs: A Modern Sage in Ancient Ethiopia.
Abbotsford, Canada: University Printers.
Brant, Howard (1984).
Church and Mission Under Fire in Ethiopia 1974-1977. Unpublished
manuscript,
Cotterell, Peter F.
(1973). Born at Midnight. Chicago, IL: Moody Press.
Cumbers, John (1995).
Count it All Joy: Testimonies from a Persecuted Church. Kearney, NE:
Morris publishing.
Davis, Raymond J.
(1966). Fire on the mountains: The story of a miracle- the church in
Ethiopia. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House.
______________.(1984).
The Winds of God. Charlotte, NC: SIM International Publication.
Duff, Clarence
W.(1980). Cords of Love: A pioneer mission to Ethiopia. Phillipsburg,
New Jersey: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co.
Fargher, Brian L.
(1996). The Origins of the New Churches Movement in Southern Ethiopia
1927-1944. New York: 1996.
Getachew Bellete
(2000). “ Elohena Haleluya” (Agonies and Hallelujah: The Story of the
Kale Heywet Church in Ethiopia, Vol III). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia:
Artistic Printing Enterprise.
Grenstedt, Staffan
(1995). Ambaricho and Shenkolla: From Local independent Church to the
Evangelical Mainstream in Ethiopia – The origin of Mekane Yesus Church
in Kembata Hadiya. Uppsala, Sweden: The Swedish Institute of Missionary
Research.
Lambie, Thomas A.
(1942). Doctor Carries On. London: Fleming H. Revell Company.
________________
(1943). Boot and Saddle in Africa. London: Fleming H. Revell Company.
Playfair, Guy W.
(1943). Trials and Triumphs. Toronto, Canada: Livingstone Press Limited.
Plueddemann, Jim
(2002). Agenda for a gracious revolution: Repositioning missions in the
21st Century. Retrieved from http:/sim.org/Directors_Page_4.asp
SIM International.
Position Paper (1978). Unpublished Manuscript
Willmott, Helen M.
(1960). The Doors Were Opened: The remarkable advance of the Gospel in
Ethiopia. London, England: Hazell Watson and Viney LTD.
Wondiye Ali (1998).
“Bemekera wist Yabebech Betekristian” (Church Out of Tribulation: The
Story of the Kale Heywet Church in Ethiopia, Vol. I). Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia: Commercial printing Enterprise.
___________ (2000).
“Yekule Lelit Wegegta” (Awakening at Midnight: The Story of the Kale
Heywet Church in Ethiopia, Vol. II). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Artistic
Printing Enterprise.
[2]
The rank “Blaten Gata” was traditionally given to the highest
respected warlords in feudal Ethiopia.
3In
late 1895, Italian forces invaded the northern part of Ethiopia. However, Menelik II completely
routed them in early 1896 as they approached the Tigray region,
specifically in Adwa. This victory, many historians mentioned this
historical incident as the victory of all black people, brought
Ethiopia new prestige as well as general recognition of its sovereign
status by the European powers
4
The word “Ato” is equivalent to the titles Sir and Mr.
5
In the course of the Italian occupation in 1936-41, a sense of
Ethiopian solidarity became a challenging experience of members from
different Evangelical churches, who shared the same experiences of
both hardships and oppression, and the rejuvenating experience of a
more or less common evangelical legacy. There evolved a sense of
Ethiopian Evangelical Churches, which transcended barriers of
ethnicity, social status and denominationalism (Staffan Grenstedt,
1995, p. 25).
6
John Hathaway Spencer became an adviser to the Ethiopian government
in 1936, when it was under attack by Mussolini’s forces. He was
himself present at the fall of Addis Ababa. Later he served Haile
Sellassie’s government as principal adviser to the Ethiopian Ministry
of Foreign Affairs for periods between 1943-1974.
7
Those who “gave the hand” to the Italians were contemptuously termed
banda, “traitor.” Emperor Haile Sellassie refused to meet
Lambie in Khartoum, and yet Lambie was honestly puzzled by the
emperor’s hostility. Cultural barriers can be as impenetrable as this,
even to men of good will ( Cotterell, 1973, p. 87).
8
It was Mr. John Spancer who drafted such a decree.